ÎÞÂëȺ½»

PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATE IN MEDIATION & MEDIATION SKILLSÌý

This accredited course will equip individuals with the skills and techniques to effectively resolve complaints and disputes, whether in a mediation itself, or using mediation skills.

The course programme has been specifically designed to deliver tangible benefits through mediation and mediation techniques in contexts: including consumer disputes, family and relationship matters, contractual disputes, conflict in the workplace, corporate conflict and disputes at senior levels.

Delegates who undertake the training and pass and the Ìýassessment will gain a certificate in professional mediation skills, enabling them to engage inÌýmediation and use mediative techniques in a wide range of contexts. Successful graduates gain anÌýacademic credit bearing qualification from ÎÞÂëȺ½»,ÌýEdinburgh, recognised by Scottish Mediation, and become eligibleÌý to apply for associate membership of theÌýChartered Institute of Arbitrators (subject to their terms).

This course normally runs either in Edinburgh or in Jersey, Channel Islands.Ìý For further information please email cdrc@qmu.ac.uk

Research services

Our research services provide clients with unrivalled expertise in the areas of consumer dispute resolution and consumer policy. A distinctive feature of our approach is our mix of practitioner and academic staff, which allows us to provide clients with the latest insights from both research and practice. We have a strong track record of delivering policy focused research for clients, which combines academic rigor with a practical focus as detailed in our Consultancy and Research Services brochure.

View our recent report and the executive summary examining the best approaches to ensure effective consumer representation in the governance of financial services.Ìý

Research Reports:

WILLIAMS, J., BRENNAN C., and VIVIAN, N. 2018.   Office of Road and Rail.  

GILL,, C., HIRST, C., SAPOUNA, M. AND WILLIAMS, J. . 2017.  University of Glasgow, Glasgow. 

Citizens Advice – Comparative Performance Analysis of ADR in Selected Markets
In partnership with the University of Westminster, we were commissioned by Citizens Advice to conduct research into the performance of ADR schemes. This involved a mapping study of existing ADR providers and evaluation of their performance against a range of criteria. The research also involved conducting interviews with consumers to find out about their experiences of complaining.

Ombudsman Services commissioned us to conduct research identifying the defining characteristics of modern consumer ombuds schemes. The research involved a desk-based study and interviews with experts in the field. The report provides important clarity on the roles, functions, and processes of consumer ombuds schemes.Ìý

We were commissioned by the Legal Ombudsman to research best practice in alternative dispute resolution. The research involved selecting 10 case study organisations across the world and identifying a range of different approaches to effective dispute resolution. The research was particularly concerned with how to design a good ADR scheme and provided a model and toolkit for ADR design.Ìý

The Legal Ombudsman commissioned us to survey the current policy landscape for ombuds schemes in the UK. This involved policy analysis of the strategic drivers which were likely to affect UK ombuds schemes now and in the future. The research used qualitative interviews with senior practitioners to understand how schemes were adapting to change. The research provided a model for the future development of ombuds schemes and a number of recommendations for policy.Ìý

In partnership with Stirling University, we were commissioned by the National Endowment for Science, Technology, and the Arts (NESTA) to look at the way in which complaints could be used to drive innovation in public services. The research collected examples of good practice and used these to identify the key factors which facilitate innovation in pubic services. The report made a range of policy recommendations and is a key resource for those interested in learning from complaints.Ìý

We were commissioned by the Care Inspectorate to investigate how people who had complained to them about a care service felt about the outcome of their complaints. The particular focus of the research was on whether complainants felt that complaining had been worth their while and whether they felt that anything had changed as a result of their complaint. The research involved qualitative interviews with complainants. The research provides important data about the way in which complainants experience complaint processes and the need to feedback on the outcome of investigations.Ìý

Consultancy

Queen Margaret Business School offers a full range of consultancy services, cutting across dispute resolution and consumer policy. Particular areas of expertise include organisational reviews, evaluations of complaint and dispute processes, consumer engagement, consumer regulation and enforcement, and consumer-focused service improvement. Our staff combine perspectives from ADR, law, public management, consumer policy, and communications to provide an holistic service to clients. To find out more about our areas of expertise, please click on the staff profiles below.

Consultancy reports:

MCBURNIE G. and WILLIAMS, J. 2019.

MCBURNIE G. and WILLIAMS, J. 2019..

Ut​ilities Disputes Ltd (New Zealand)
We were commissioned to conduct the . This involves a review of the organisation’s effectiveness against the key criteria for industry based alternative dispute resolution schemes. The methodology includes desk based research and fieldwork. This consultancy recognizes CDR’s international expertise in consumer dispute resolution and organisational reviews.Ìý

Ombudsman Services
We wereÌýappointed to act as Ombudsman Services’ Interim Independent Assessor. This involved dealing with complaints from dissatisfied users who had exhausted the internal complaints process of the organisation. Eighty eight complaints were reviewed during the period of appointment, with a written adjudication provided in each case. An annual review featuring recommendations to the organisation was prepared and published in the organization’s Annual Report.

Welsh Language Commissioner
We were commissioned to conduct a review of the Welsh Language Commissioner’s complaints process. This involved carrying out a series of interviews with key members of staff within the organisation; reviewing the organization’s complaints procedures, guidance and founding legislative instruments; observing staff handling complaints; and reviewing a sample of case files. The review made a number of recommendations. The review also conducted a comparative analysis of approaches to collecting customer feedback used by independent complaint handling organisations.

Audit Scotland
We were commissioned to conduct an evaluation of Audit Scotland’s correspondence process. This process involved receipt of correspondence from members of the public in relation to the performance of public bodies. The process was evaluated with reference to best practice established in the Ombudsman Association’s Guide to Principles of Good Complaint Handling. The evaluation included examination of a sample of cases and interviews with key stakeholders in the organisation. The project resulted in a number of recommendations being made to the client and a significantly improved process for dealing with customers’ complaints and concerns.

Please contactÌýus to discuss how we can help you with your organisation’s consultancy needs: cdrc@qmu.ac.uk